"Franz Kafka's -The Metamorphosis"-lecture by Vladimir Nabokov-in his Lectures on Literature (published 1980 but from lectures written around 1953, 32 pages)
As I was finishing up "The Metamorphosis" by Franz Kafka (1883 to 1924-Prague) I found to my great surprise both volumes of Lectures on Literature by Vladimir Nabokov (1899 to 1978-St Petersburg, Russia) on sale in a mall near me. These volumes are based on lectures given by Nabokov during his teaching career (1940 to 1958) at various American universities. Volume one covers works by Dickens, Joyce, Austin, Stevenson, Proust and Franz's Kafka's "The Metamorphosis". Volume two covers Russian Literature. The sale of his books came to liberate him from the need to teach. (Lolita, Pale Fire, etc).
When I began to explore the world of the short story I began to do numerous searches on Google relating to "world's best, most famous, most important short story, etc". On every list "The Metamorphosis" was near the top. It well might be the most important or influential short story of the 20th century (at most I think it is second to James Joyce"s "The Dead"-I will post on that soon). I see no need to repeat the plot.
What I was very struck with in this story is how much it is about the entrapment of family life. As I got into the story I began to feel more sympathy for Gregor for the dreadful life he lived than for the transformation that over took him. I began to wonder if it was a strange wish fulfilment dream. Maybe turning into a giant insect was preferable to him than continuing on with a meaningless life. I also noted that somehow Gregor in his willingness to support his parasitic family had taken the meaning from their lives. The interpretations one could put on this story are near endless. "The Metamorphosis" is really a holy text of modernism.
As I read Nabokov's lecture on the story I tried to imagine how terribly intimidating he must have seemed to college students in America in the 1940s and 1950s. (There is a really good video on YouTube of the actor Christopher Plummer playing Nabokov lecturing in one of his classes). I do not presume to paraphrase him-he still intimidates! One of his central points to his students is to open yourself up to respond to the work you are reading. To look at it with your own eyes. He tells us do not assume what you heard about a famous work is right. He used his extensive entomological background to proof that the common as taught in school notion that Gregor was transformed into a roach is wrong. He even included detailed drawings to show us just what type of insect Gregor had become. As I knew it would be, the lecture is beautifully written and totally brilliant. He does make use of some dubious rhetorical style in his treatment of views he opposes or writers he looks down on. He states his own view magnificently then he simply declares from Olympus that anyone who thinks other than he does is a tasteless unintelligent bore. I laughed out loud when he said Thomas Mann was like a dwarf in comparison to Kafka without any justification at all (as I thought about it I wondered if the college students in his class had even heard of Thomas Mann). His teaching style was evidently quite theatrical. I think many who read his lectures (or watch the video which I hope you will) will wish as I did that they could have had such a great teacher so into the reading life. I loved it in his opening lecture when he said literature is superior to all other art forms and requires more of the full human capacity to respond to than music or painting.
"The Metamorphosis" is really a "must read" literary work. There are numerous places you can reads it for free online. It is not hard or difficult to read. Everyday we see reviews of writers who are described as "Kafkaesque". The next time you read such a description stop there and read the original. I will read two other of his short stories and post on them soon, "The Hunger Artist" and "The Penal Colony". I hope to read Pale Fire soon.
If anyone has any suggestion as to short stories I might like please leave them in comment. Thanks
Mel u
When I began to explore the world of the short story I began to do numerous searches on Google relating to "world's best, most famous, most important short story, etc". On every list "The Metamorphosis" was near the top. It well might be the most important or influential short story of the 20th century (at most I think it is second to James Joyce"s "The Dead"-I will post on that soon). I see no need to repeat the plot.
What I was very struck with in this story is how much it is about the entrapment of family life. As I got into the story I began to feel more sympathy for Gregor for the dreadful life he lived than for the transformation that over took him. I began to wonder if it was a strange wish fulfilment dream. Maybe turning into a giant insect was preferable to him than continuing on with a meaningless life. I also noted that somehow Gregor in his willingness to support his parasitic family had taken the meaning from their lives. The interpretations one could put on this story are near endless. "The Metamorphosis" is really a holy text of modernism.
As I read Nabokov's lecture on the story I tried to imagine how terribly intimidating he must have seemed to college students in America in the 1940s and 1950s. (There is a really good video on YouTube of the actor Christopher Plummer playing Nabokov lecturing in one of his classes). I do not presume to paraphrase him-he still intimidates! One of his central points to his students is to open yourself up to respond to the work you are reading. To look at it with your own eyes. He tells us do not assume what you heard about a famous work is right. He used his extensive entomological background to proof that the common as taught in school notion that Gregor was transformed into a roach is wrong. He even included detailed drawings to show us just what type of insect Gregor had become. As I knew it would be, the lecture is beautifully written and totally brilliant. He does make use of some dubious rhetorical style in his treatment of views he opposes or writers he looks down on. He states his own view magnificently then he simply declares from Olympus that anyone who thinks other than he does is a tasteless unintelligent bore. I laughed out loud when he said Thomas Mann was like a dwarf in comparison to Kafka without any justification at all (as I thought about it I wondered if the college students in his class had even heard of Thomas Mann). His teaching style was evidently quite theatrical. I think many who read his lectures (or watch the video which I hope you will) will wish as I did that they could have had such a great teacher so into the reading life. I loved it in his opening lecture when he said literature is superior to all other art forms and requires more of the full human capacity to respond to than music or painting.
"The Metamorphosis" is really a "must read" literary work. There are numerous places you can reads it for free online. It is not hard or difficult to read. Everyday we see reviews of writers who are described as "Kafkaesque". The next time you read such a description stop there and read the original. I will read two other of his short stories and post on them soon, "The Hunger Artist" and "The Penal Colony". I hope to read Pale Fire soon.
If anyone has any suggestion as to short stories I might like please leave them in comment. Thanks
Mel u




