Showing posts with label George Bernard Shaw. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Bernard Shaw. Show all posts

Thursday, June 14, 2012

John Bull's Other Island by George Bernard Shaw

John Bull's Other Island by George Bernard Shaw (1904)
"John Bull's Other Islander" -chapter three of Inventing Ireland:  The Literature of the Modern Nation by Declan Kiberd (1995)


Inventing Ireland
An Irish Quarter Event

"Ireland is the only spot on earth which still produces the ideal Englishman of Irish history"-George Bernard Shaw

As soon as I began to read Inventing Ireland:  The Literature of the Modern Nation by Declan Kiberd I knew it was the volume I needed to begin my real education in the literature of Ireland.  I  am very interested in the post colonial approach to literature and have posted on many Asian works from that perspective.   Like everyone, my basic guide in this is Edward Said and as soon as I saw Kiberd was looking at Irish literature in the same way I at once bought an Ebook. I previously posted on his chapter of Edith Somerville and Ross Martin (Violet Martin) and it did change my understanding of their work.   I will soon read also their The Real Charlotte as it is the primary work Kiberd writes on and will reread his chapter also.   I have decided I will try to read all of the  works (or at least all I can download for free) Kiberd makes reference to in Inventing Ireland and post on them in the light of what I learned from him.   Kiberd's book is beautifully written and deeply learned.  He sets things in the historical and cultural context.  This will be an on going Irish Quarter event.  

John Bull's Other Island is George Bernard Shaw's (1856 to 1950, Dublin, Ireland-there is some background information on Shaw in my prior posts on him) only play that takes place at all in Ireland.   One of the things I have learned of since I began the Irish Quarter:  A Celebration of The Irish Short Story on March 11 was that the English constructed their own vision of the Irishman, the stage Irishman as it is often called.   Like any colonizer there is a need to see the people in the country you rule as in need of your care and protection. The English cast the Irishman as comic figures given to wild emotions, not inclined to work very hard, unable to stick to a project without falling into drink, given to trickery and full of superstition.   They treated Catholicism as one step above a pagan form of religion.  The Irish were basically cast as children in need of  the steady hand of the English.

I would love to have been in the audience in London and then in Dublin when this play opened so I could have seen the differing reactions to Shaw's actually quite funny characterization of the  Irish.   The play brings on stage in the opening act an Irishman who offers to go along as guide for an Englishman who is going to Ireland.    The man is the very epitome of the stage Irish Paddy figure, a complete liar, a fluid talker who speaks half in riddles in a sing song kind of way, loves whiskey and a complete suck up to the English.  Kibard tells us that because Ireland has lost so many of the most enterprising people of the country to emigration a new class of landowner has risen in Ireland.   These Irish landowners are not at all concerned with bettering the country.   There is also a cultural movement in Ireland at this time, called now The Irish Renaissance, which Kiberd says in part plays into the hands of the English as it was more concerned with mummifying Irish culture than reviving it.  The Irish in this movement basically played up to the liberal university educated Englishman's romantic view of Ireland.  "John Bull's Other Island" was per Kiberd Shaw's warning that Ireland was in danger of being turned into "a tourist's landscape of colourful, non-threatening characters, who mark off their "interesting" cultural differences from the London visitor, even as they become more tractable to his economic design".     The play shows us how both the English and the Irish were often playing out roles that they thought the other expected of them... The Irish acted the fool and the sycophant in order to deal with the English who in turned played at nobility.   Many of the English in Ireland in fact had problems of various sorts that were easier for them to deal with in a colony.  Just like in India, the locals long ago learned that an Englishman in a colony is there seeking something he cannot find at home and that he often has things wrong with him.     One of the things any colonizer wants is women.  In the character of Nora we see an idealized, in the minds of the English visitors, version of the Irish woman, a woman forced to become strong by a race of weak good for nothing more than versifying and drinking men.   The Englishman fancies himself in love with her and sees her as better than the women at home.   

"John Bull's Other Island" was really a lot of fun to read.  I would love to see it acted on the stage one day but somehow I know I never will.




Mel u




Monday, April 9, 2012

"The Miraculous Revenge" by George Bernard Shaw

"The Miraculous Revenge" by George Bernard Shaw  (1918, 12 pages)


Irish Short Story Week
March 11 to July 1
Nobel Prize Winners Only Week
April 9 to April 16



My Prior Posts for ISSW Year Two






Please consider joining us for Irish Short Story Week, March 11 to July 1 (yes long week and I feel an Irish Short Story Year might happen in 2013).   All you have to do to join us is to post on one or more Irish short stories or a non-fiction book that relates to Irish literary culture and let me know about it. I also welcome guest posts.   Everything you need to participate is in the resources page including links to 1000s of stories.  As of today I am opening up the event to Latin American writers of Irish descent.   This will be harder for those of us who do not read Spanish to explore (there are stories in English) but it is important to me to show the vast influence of the Irish Short Story Writers.  I am also as of now opening the events to Irish New Zealand writers.  I plan to add resources on these areas soon but I do need help on the Latin America Irish writers.   There are plans for Argentine Irish Day in the works now.


This week I will be posting on short stories by three Irish Nobel Prize Winners, George Bernard Shaw, William Butler Yeats and Samuel Beckett.  I am also posting in Nobel Prize winners from Indian and Japan, both with strong Irish connections.  Rabindranath Tagore gave a series of lectures that inspired Yeats.  He so impressed Mrs Yeats that Tagore was to play a large part in her automatic writings.  (Details on Tagore-India 1861 to 1941 will be in my forthcoming post).  Kenzaburo Oe (Japan, 1935) made eight references to William Butler Yeats during his 1994 Nobel Lecture.  I will talk more about the interaction of Oe with Yeats in my post on one of his short novellas.  


Decades ago I developed an interest in the work of George Bernard Shaw and I read a number of his plays. In September last year I posted on his play Androcles and the Lion.

George Bernard Shaw (1856 to 1950-Dublin) is most known now as the author of the play,Pygmalion, on which the movie My Fair Lady was based.

He won the Nobel Prize in 1925 and an Oscar in 1938, the only person to have done both.   He was a tremendously productive writer with more than 60 dramas and countless articles and essays.   He was also very active in social causes.    
"Carmilla, you can
dream of looking this
good at 5000"
Eachna

Shaw did not write a lot of short stories and judging by "The Miraculous Revenge" it is for sure our loss.  

"Mr Shaw, I am available to read for
the lead in a movie"-Carmilla
As the story opens, it is told in the first person by a man seeming to be mid thirties or so,  who has just come back to Dublin and is off to visit his uncle, the Cardinal Archbishop.   The opening paragraph really drew me into the story, the characters and I for sure wanted to know more.   The Cardinal is a member of the Anglican church, as his nephew and they have  a patronizing attitude toward the Irish.

There are several references to the people of Ireland in this story.   I found them very interesting

He, father to a great flock of poor and ignorant Irish; an austere and saintly man, to whom livers of hopeless lives daily appealed for help heavenward.
I think Irish ladies grudge a man a moment's peace.""I wonder you have ever prevailed on yourself to associate with Irish ladies, since they are so far beneath you."
"I don't know what London manners are, Mr. Legge; but in Ireland gentlemen are expected to mind their own business.
If that be so there is no such thing as a true man in Ireland.


The main plot of the story is about a paranormal event in a graveyard that the Cardinal assigned his nephew to investigate.  It is very well done and quite exciting.

You can read this story or download it (along with lots of his other works) here.

I will next post on a short story by Samuel Beckett for Nobel Prize Winners Only Please Week.

"Ladies, no need to
fight over me"-Rory






Mel u

Friday, August 26, 2011

Androcles and the Lion by George Bernard Shaw

Androcles and the Lion by George Bernard Shaw (1912)


An Aesop's Fable Brought to the Stage


George Bernard Shaw (1856 to 1950-Ireland) is most known now as the author of the play, Pygmalion, on which the movie My Fair Lady was based.

He won the Nobel Prize in 1925 and an Oscar in 1938, the only person to have done both.   He was a tremendously productive writer with more than 60 dramas and countless articles and essays.   He was also very active in social causes.    

The story line of Androcles and the Lion is considered to have been one of Aesop's fables.    I think almost everyone knows the basic plot.   There has been a movie based on it and I have seen it in cartoons.   Androcles, a Christian, comes upon a lion in the wilderness and pulls a thorn out of his foot.   Androcles is sent by the Romans to the Colosseum to be killed by a lion, etc.  

Shaw does a great job filling out details in the story.   We meet his wife and we kind of like her but she is a real person for sure.   We see the attitudes of the Romans toward the Christians.   There are some very good conversations about religion between the Roman guards and the condemned Christians.   All a Christian has to do to escape the lions is to swear he believes in the Roman gods.   A Roman officer tries to explain to Androcles and his wife that even he does not belief in the gods, it is just a formality so why not swear.   

The play is interesting and an enjoyable read.   I liked the stage descriptions a really lot.   The play is pushing Shaw's social agenda but it is entertainment first.    

I read this at Dailylit.com.   As a drama I think it could be preformed in well under two hours.   It is not a heavy read or at all abrasive.    

I think most people will enjoy this play and be glad they read it.   It is not one of Shaw's major works and did not change the history of drama or anything like that but it is very well written with some great conversations and the characters seem real to me.

The next drama I will read will be Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett probably to be followed by The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov.

Mel u


Featured Post

Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain’s Gulag in Kenya by Caroline Elkins - 2005 - 701 Pages

  Imperial Reckoning:     The Untold Story of Britain’s Gulag in Kenya by Caroline Elkins - 2005 - 701 Pages 2006 Pulitzer Prize Winner From...